 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
01 Nov 2001, 14:17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Top Hackers
I think it should be based on installed hacks, or by the number your hacks has been downloaded, or maybe by vote, it will be more accurate and will stimulate code hackers to write better hacks, instead of 9999999 hacks.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#2
01 Nov 2001, 14:44
|
||||
|
||||
|
i like the current one.... it's logical
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#3
01 Nov 2001, 14:50
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it would be more logical if you write a good functional hack, that has been downloaded 10000 times, rather than 10 hacks of cosmetic modifications.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#4
03 Nov 2001, 06:00
|
||||
|
||||
|
What would be the difference between having 2 installs on 30 cosmetic adaptions and 50 installs on one good hack? Doesnt seem like making it go by installs would be much different?
__________________
Bane ° talkloud Network - Forums never smelled this good. ° el coolo hacko - vbStats vBORG Chat - Hang with the price of poop flinging *monkey sound* (irc.devcore.co.uk port 6667 - channel: #vBorg) No members have liked this post.
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28.