[New Joe]

Any reason why this wasn't just built into it from the start?

[Paul M]

Yes, its doesnt play well across multiple timezones.

Note that as in previous versions, the timestamp is fixed, i.e. it will not change if being viewed from different timezones.

Thats fine in a mod, but not acceptable in the core product.

[New Joe]

Ok, thanks for the reply.
I will give it a go.

[BaanFarsang]

Very good MOD. Thanks you.

[Mr_Running]

thanks Paul

[etca]

please add, Usergroup exceptions (Allows you to exempt certain usergroups from the doublepost merges) and Forum exceptions (Allows you to exempt certain forums form the doublepost merges) in this mod too.

thxb4

[JVSP3]

Thanks

[Paul M]

Originally Posted by etca

please add, Usergroup exceptions (Allows you to exempt certain usergroups from the doublepost merges) and Forum exceptions (Allows you to exempt certain forums form the doublepost merges) in this mod too.

Why would I do that ? It would be pointless duplication of core functionality.

[TheInsaneManiac]

Great mod man, seriously should be in Core.

Request though, Anyway to have the customer separator to be used and just use a variable like %time or something? I also don't like that it updates the time of the original post either.

[EliasAlucard]

Keep up the good work, Paul.

[dougdirac]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Yes, its doesnt play well across multiple timezones.



Thats fine in a mod, but not acceptable in the core product.

When I first noticed the double post feature, I always thought it should have included a time stamp, but with relative time because of the timezone issue.

So you'd have your first post. And then the separator to your followup would say something like

---- 30 minutes later ----

or

---- after 2.5 hours ----

something like that. See what I mean? Timezone agnostic because it's all relative.

[zonaenlinea]

thanks very good

[dougdirac]

How does this feature work on vBulletin.org?

[Paul M]

Pretty much the same.