 |
|
|
Mod Options |
|
#1
27 Mar 2008, 06:39
|
|||
|
|||
|
xcache or eaccelerator?
Hello, I have a server and I have several proxies on it together with some of my websites.
The thing is sometime it will overload. I was thinking to install xcache or eaccelerator. Can you suggest me which should I install? Which is better? Need expert to help me on this. Thanks. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by nyunyu; 27 Mar 2008 at 06:45. 
|
| Comments |
|
#2
27 Mar 2008, 09:50
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will strongly advise xcache
__________________
Mert Gökçeimam / Crawlability Inc. DepKaç | vBSEO 3.3.0 - vBulletin Search Engine Optimisation No members have liked this post.
|
|
#3
27 Mar 2008, 10:26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Any reason why?
Appreciate if you could be more details of pros and cons. No members have liked this post.
|
|
#4
27 Mar 2008, 13:10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I use eaccelerator due to an incompatibility between xcache and my php version and it's worth doing but xcache is accepted as faster in general.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#5
27 Mar 2008, 13:33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I google around and found out that xcache is somewhat faster and works great with ioncube and zend.
I'll try xcache to see how. No members have liked this post.
|
|
#6
27 Mar 2008, 18:10
|
|||
|
|||
|
xcache, in my opinion, is the better of the two.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#7
27 Mar 2008, 19:22
|
||||
|
||||
|
With vb 3.7 or a simple mod here from vb.org you can move vbulletins datastore into xcache. Right there it makes it superior.
__________________
Immortal Guild - My Guilds Website No members have liked this post.
|
|
#8
29 Mar 2008, 22:52
|
||||
|
||||
|
eAccelerator is better as you can enable/disable it for directories (sites).
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#9
29 Mar 2008, 22:58
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would recommend xCache.
Regards Jason 
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#10
29 Mar 2008, 23:28
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my case I have a test forum, a blog and few others sites on the same server.
with APC & xCache those scripts ends up taking more memory than the main forums. I guess the thread starter will have the same problem
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#11
30 Mar 2008, 01:26
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are probably better using APC, since that is what PHP 6 will you use.
Regards Jason
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#12
30 Mar 2008, 03:02
|
|||
|
|||
|
Originally Posted by unitedpunjab
Sorry but that is incorrect, you can assign either of those programs the amount of ram you want them to use, they will never use more ram than vbulletin & mysql.
--------------- Added 30 Mar 2008 at 03:04 ---------------
Originally Posted by Jase2
How exactly would you know that using apc with php6 is better than using xcache & php 6?
Have you done a performance test on this? No members have liked this post.
Last edited by snakes1100; 30 Mar 2008 at 03:04. Reason: Auto-Merged DoublePost
|
|
#13
30 Mar 2008, 03:39
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, but it will be used. I'm going off Phillip (creator of storyteller & ContentTeller).
 Regards Jason
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#14
30 Mar 2008, 06:48
|
||||
|
||||
|
Originally Posted by snakes1100
You did,nt get my point.
like How would you prevent compiled files from the 'test forums' to take up 'allocated memory' in APC and EA ? No members have liked this post.
|
|
#15
30 Mar 2008, 16:24
|
|||
|
|||
|
The way your previous post is written makes people think that you was talking about xcache & apc, not your other scripts.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
«
Previous Mod
|
Next Mod
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Mod Options | |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:09.