[y2ksw]

Originally Posted by Baitona

is it also possible to import the images to other domain?

Short answer: no

You would like to store the images to a media server which would need a lot of more operations. However, if you have Linux, you can use the fsftp file system in order to move imported files into another server, or a symbolic link to move it on the same server to another domain. Together with the Forum URL Replacement option, you may achieve then the desired effect. This applies however only to the newer version, here: http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=253309

[Manoel Júnior]

My bro',

Please this version update:

- update all equal to Import External Image (vb4)
- a scan and remove of unused images
- a scan and update of images
- Watermark
- Integrate automatically with iMG Cache

Is it possible?

Congratulations, you're a great developer.

[y2ksw]

You may watermark your pictures with external tools (e.g. download - watermark - upload). I will not add this feature for copyright reasons.

All the other requests may be possible, I'll think about it

[Manoel Júnior]

Originally Posted by y2ksw

You may watermark your pictures with external tools (e.g. download - watermark - upload). I will not add this feature for copyright reasons.

All the other requests may be possible, I'll think about it

Again, thank you for all the help. Many people still have version 3.8, an update would be very good this product to these people.

Thanks again.

[Manoel Júnior]

Originally Posted by y2ksw

You may watermark your pictures with external tools (e.g. download - watermark - upload). I will not add this feature for copyright reasons.

All the other requests may be possible, I'll think about it

Do not forget us (vb3.8​​) please my friend.

[dartho]

Excellent. I came a cross an issuie where it would attempt to cache album pictures (vb 3.8.7), but instead it cache a 1x1px img? (vBulletin's cron ?)

This however didn't happen when attachments were used in img tags

To work around I added the following code to y2kswimgcache.php so that any images in the forums were not cached:

Block Disabled:      (Update License Status)
Suspended or Unlicensed Members Cannot View Code.

[Manoel Júnior]

Any news y2ksw??

Thanks

[dartho]

This works well under 3.8.7!

[y2ksw]

Originally Posted by Manoel Júnior

Any news y2ksw??

Thanks

No news yet ... overrun by work.

[SCuN]

Very nice mod! works very well on 3.8.7, but I noticed a bug, when you give a space after the img bbcode, modification does not work.

[y2ksw]

Originally Posted by SCuN

Very nice mod! works very well on 3.8.7, but I noticed a bug, when you give a space after the img bbcode, modification does not work.

It's not intended to have a space there

If there are spaces, probably they are intentional in order to show the tags in the post.

[dartho]

After minimal testing, your version of this for VB4 works under vb 3.8 also ... (although there may be an issue with cron logging?)

[adwade]

Originally Posted by Manoel Júnior

Please this version update:
- a scan and remove of unused images

One quick question: IS there any way to determine if a cached image is no longer in use?(i.e. a thread which had a cached-image in it has been deleted, but the cached-image remains) From what I've gathered reading this thread, if a thread is deleted and the cached-image is no longer needed it still remains (unused) in place. True?

This is a GREAT MOD and has kept our discussions meaningful, no matter how old they are by keeping the images within our threads intact.

Oh and I'll 2nd Manoel Junior's comment: Congratulations, you're a great developer.

[y2ksw]

Originally Posted by adwade

One quick question: IS there any way to determine if a cached image is no longer in use?(i.e. a thread which had a cached-image in it has been deleted, but the cached-image remains) From what I've gathered reading this thread, if a thread is deleted and the cached-image is no longer needed it still remains (unused) in place. True?

This is a GREAT MOD and has kept our discussions meaningful, no matter how old they are by keeping the images within our threads intact.

Oh and I'll 2nd Manoel Junior's comment: Congratulations, you're a great developer.

If a thread is deleted and the cached-image is no longer needed it still remains (unused) in place: True

Because a post may be copied inside and even outside your forums and their images are still in use. Since you link images statically to your site, you are becoming the primary source of that copy, if the original disappears for one or another reason.

I am aware of the space problem, but in the very long run, old images may become very interesting to researchers. And thus, new people are coming to your site, only because you got what they need

[adwade]

Originally Posted by y2ksw

I am aware of the space problem, but in the very long run, old images may become very interesting to researchers. And thus, new people are coming to your site, only because you got what they need

I understand and can agree with your logic.

I'm running v1.0.2.0 on vB3.8.6 and it's run flawlessly since I installed it w-a-y back when.(i.e. vB 3.6) My only concern is how many images can I hold in just ONE directory, before it blows up on me?

And along those lines, is there any way to patch/modify the version I'm running to keep-it-going?(i.e. as Focus2 suggested in post #150 of this thread)